Back to Blog
    C-Level Executive

    Before You Start SOC 2 (Or ISO, Or Vanta): Do This First

    Starting SOC 2 or ISO 27001? Most teams spend 80% of their time on archaeology, not compliance. Here's the step that makes everything faster and cheaper.

    By Maya Bennett

    Before You Start SOC 2 (Or ISO, Or Vanta): Do This First

    Your sales team just lost a deal because the prospect needs SOC 2. Or your board asked about ISO 27001. Or a customer sent over a compliance questionnaire you can't answer.

    So now you're looking at Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, or going straight for the full ISO/SOC 2 certification.

    And you're about to spend 6-12 months in compliance hell. Trust me, I've seen this movie.

    What You're Actually Signing Up For

    When you start a compliance process, here's what you need:

    Security compliance: SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR readiness

    Industry-specific: HIPAA (healthcare), PCI DSS (payments), FedRAMP (government)

    Customer requirements: Vendor security assessments, custom questionnaires, insurance documentation

    The tools help. Vanta and Drata are good at automating controls and evidence collection. ISO and SOC 2 auditors know what they're doing.

    But here's what they all have in common: they need evidence. Lots of it.

    The Part Nobody Warns You About

    You'll spend months answering questions like:

    • What's your tech stack and where does data flow?
    • Who has access to production systems?
    • How do you handle backups and disaster recovery?
    • What's your change management process?
    • Where are your security policies documented?

    If you're starting from scratch, every one of these questions becomes a research project.

    You'll be pulling information from:

    • AWS console
    • GitHub
    • Your head
    • That Google Doc someone wrote two years ago
    • Slack threads
    • Tribal knowledge from the team

    Then three months later, a customer sends a vendor security questionnaire asking the exact same things in slightly different words. So you do it all again.

    Six months after that, your insurance company wants documentation. Again.

    Why This Takes So Long

    The problem isn't the compliance frameworks. They're actually pretty reasonable.

    The problem is that most companies don't have their technical environment documented in a structured, defensible way before they start.

    So the "compliance project" becomes:

    • 20% actual compliance work
    • 80% archaeology (figuring out what you have, where it lives, how it works)

    That's why the timeline estimates are always wrong. That's why it's so expensive. And that's why three people from your engineering team are spending 10 hours a week on this instead of building product.

    What Smart Teams Do First

    The teams that move through compliance quickly (and cheaply) do one thing differently.

    They document their technical environment before they start the compliance process.

    Not a perfect document. Not a 100-page manual. Just a structured, evidence-backed baseline of:

    • What systems you have
    • How you manage data & privacy
    • How you manage access and security
    • What your actual processes are (not what you wish they were)

    When you have that baseline:

    Vanta/Drata implementation takes weeks, not months (you're not discovering your environment while trying to comply)

    Vendor questionnaires take hours, not days (you already have the answers)

    Auditors move faster (you can actually produce evidence when they ask)

    The second compliance framework is 80% faster (evidence is reusable)

    The Step Most People Skip

    Here's what I'd recommend if you're about to start this journey:

    Before you sign up for Vanta or kick off ISO, spend a week creating a structured baseline of your technical environment.

    Document what exists. Identify where the gaps are. Capture the evidence in one place.

    Think of it as pre-compliance. The work you'd have to do anyway, but done once and done properly so you're not repeating it every time someone asks a question.

    This is exactly what StackUp was built for. Not to replace Vanta or ISO auditors. But to give you the structured baseline they'll need anyway.

    So when you do start the compliance process, you're not starting from zero. You're starting from evidence.

    The Bottom Line

    Compliance isn't optional anymore. If you want enterprise customers, you need it. If you want good insurance rates, you need it. If your board asks about it, you need it.

    But you don't need to make it harder than it has to be.

    Do the baseline work first. Then bring in the compliance tools and auditors. You'll move faster, spend less, and your engineering team won't hate you.

    If you're staring down a SOC 2 or ISO process and want to see what this baseline work looks like, get in touch to chat.

    Author

    Maya Bennett